US cities are axing Flock Safety surveillance technology

Wednesday, April 8, 2026 at 12:26 PMRetrieved Wednesday, April 8, 2026 at 02:00 PM
Current Sentiment Analysis
Negative
-0.700

Negative sentiment concerning surveillance technology, specifically criticizing Flock Safety's impact on privacy and governance.

google/gemini-3-flash-preview
Analyzed Wednesday, April 8, 2026 at 02:00 PM
Entities
Loading entities...

--- Comments ---

- gorgonical: Musician-turning-tech anarchist (?) Benn Jordan is making a very interesting series of videos about Flock cameras, their poor safety, and their gray-area interfacing with local governments:<p><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.youtube.com&#x2F;watch?v=UMIwNiwQewQ" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.youtube.com&#x2F;watch?v=UMIwNiwQewQ</a><p><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.youtube.com&#x2F;watch?v=uB0gr7Fh6lY" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.youtube.com&#x2F;watch?v=uB0gr7Fh6lY</a><p><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.youtube.com&#x2F;watch?v=vU1-uiUlHTo" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.youtube.com&#x2F;watch?v=vU1-uiUlHTo</a><p><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.youtube.com&#x2F;watch?v=Pp9MwZkHiMQ" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.youtube.com&#x2F;watch?v=Pp9MwZkHiMQ</a><p>I recommend them.

- e2le: For those unfamiliar, you can read more about the flock safety cameras themselves here:<p><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;consumerrights.wiki&#x2F;w&#x2F;Flock_license_plate_readers" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;consumerrights.wiki&#x2F;w&#x2F;Flock_license_plate_readers</a><p>And more about the company behind the cameras:<p><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;consumerrights.wiki&#x2F;w&#x2F;Flock_Safety" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;consumerrights.wiki&#x2F;w&#x2F;Flock_Safety</a>

- jmuguy: I&#x27;m surprised Garrett Langley still has a job, he seems wildly out of touch. For instance he really believes that his Panopticon as a service is the reason crime is down in cities, conveniently ignoring crime rates prior to COVID.

- Dezvous: It&#x27;s quite ironic to get an amazon ring video ad while viewing this article.

- gosub100: Someone in my hometown was arrested for vandalizing them. The media chose to say &quot;city owned security camera&quot;. It&#x27;s amazing how they will rush to defend private enterprise.

- josefritzishere: Funny that. Not everyone wants to live in an open air prison.

- phendrenad2: It&#x27;s funny, if the company had just sold cameras to cities, they probably could have avoided this whole mess. But they just had to hit some keywords for Wall Street (like &quot;AI&quot; &quot;cloud&quot; and &quot;SaaS&quot;), which had the side-effect of making it appear (true or not) that they were part of a Palantir-style surveillance panopticon that tracks you everywhere.

- lenerdenator: It really is amazing how they managed to fit so much copper into those devices.

- jdross: I realize how unpopular flock is, and I will first say that I have literally never personally looked into the privacy concerns. But one city you don’t see named here is SF, which has cited Flock as a primary driver of its 10x reduction in car break-ins, and 30% reduction in burglaries. Those were a quality of life plague while I lived there

- waNpyt-menrew: Would crime go up, down or stay the same if all surveillance cameras were removed? The answer to that is the only one that matters.<p>Ironically many people who whine about surveillance cameras have their video door bells or similar setups.<p>So which is it?

Read the original article